The critics' reviews were enthusiastic. I recall that all of us young moviegoers dug it. The corpse in the potato sack sequence was brilliant. Yet, after I saw Frenzy, I couldn't recall the names of the lead actors. Not because they lacked skills, but because they were British actors not widely known to American audiences. We weren't familiar with the dark, brawny Jon Finch as the wrong man who unwittingly did all the right things to make himself the suspect. All the right things except commit murder, that is
Hitchcock's 1966 Hollywood movie, Torn Curtain, had known stars. He put Hud in bed with Mary Poppins. The political thriller starred Paul Newman and Julie Andrews. It was Hitchcock's film after Marnie. Torn Curtain got buzz because of its stars.
But Frenzy is a better film. Yet it's a film that I rarely, if ever, hear mentioned by Hitchcock fans. In Frenzy, Hitchcock has The Wrong Man and the Psycho necktie murderer as friends. One asks the other for help. But the innocent, hot-tempered suspect has no idea that his friend is the necktie killer who has London women in fear.
As he'd done before, Hitchcock makes us the voyeur along with a lead character with an obsession or sexual fetish. In Frenzy, the director had outlived the Hollywood production codes and was free to use nudity to heighten the chills of the voyeurism and murder.
American moviegoers knew Alan Bates from his co-starring role in Zorba the Greek with Anthony Quinn, Georgy Girl and his lead role in Ken Russell's Women in Love as bearded Rupert, the natural man who loves the intimacy of nude fireside wrestling.
American audiences loved Michael Caine as Alfie.
Here's my question for Hitchcock fans: If Alfried Hitchcock had cast stars like Alan Bates and Michael Caine in the male leads instead of Jon Finch and Barry Foster....
...would Frenzy be getting more attention today than it does? Or if Hitchcock had worked again with his Marnie star, Sean Connery, and cast Connery's actress wife, Oscar nominee Diane Cilento, as the suspect and the suspect's tavern waitress girlfriend, would that star power have given Frenzy more attention through the years?
Cilento could've been one of the last Hitchcock Blondes had she been cast. She was a Best Supporting Actress nominee for her bawdy comedy work in Best Picture of 1963, Tom Jones. Her sexy dinner scene with Albert Finney was one of the film's highlights.
If you like Hitchcock and you haven't seen Frenzy, it's well worth a look.
I saw FRENZY for the first time a few years ago at my local cinematheque. I like FRENZY a lot. It marks a grand return to one of Hitchcock's favorite themes: that of a man accused of a murder he did not commit and all but trapped by the circumstantial evidence. The film has the typical, trademark Hitchcock humor. I particularly enjoyed the film's ending, when Foster's serial killer character drags a large trunk into a room where he's carrying a dead body. He comes face to face with two detectives, who catch him red-handed. One of the detectives says to Foster, "You're not wearing your tie." Very funny! It's very much an overlooked film of Hitchcock's for a couple of reasons - A.) the lack of star power as you mentioned and B.) the era it was made in - the early 70's which was not Hitchcock in the prime of his career. So to answer your question of whether or not the film would have received more attention had it been cast with bigger name stars, the answer(judging from my previous comment), is YES. By the way, I was thoroughly entertained by last year's HITCHCOCK, with Anthony Hopkins as the famed director and Helen Mirren as his suffering but patient wife, in a story about the turbulent production of Hitch's slasher classic, PSYCHO. Anyone who hasn't had the chance to see it yet should check it out - it's definitely worth a look, especially for die-hard Hitchcock fans.
ReplyDeleteYou know what another brilliant touch was? That detective having a wife who fancied herself a gourmet cook and frustrated him by not making a simple, hearty meal. Loved that. And the film's final line is a gem.
ReplyDelete